|
|
 |
|
 |
How
FiberPath Works |
| |
Why have we developed
FiberPath sails? The answer is that because the fibers
in a FiberPath sail are aligned with the primary loads in the
sail, and a FiberPath sail can be built with multiple
fiber patterns to address secondary loads, a FiberPath sail
has a wider range and is stronger for its weight than a tri-radial
sail. The trouble with tri-radial sails is they only cover primary
loads. Because the fibers in FiberPath sails run on top
of each other in different directions, specific loads in each
area of the sail can be handled.
With FiberPath technology we can build true load-path
sails with proven fast shapes and the right combination of fibers
and films for each application. |
| |
 |
| |
Cost
of a FiberPath Sail vs. a Tri-Radial
Sail |
| |
The
average cost of a FiberPath sail is anywhere from the
same as a paneled sail to 10% higher. When we reach full production
we hope to be able to deliver FiberPath sails at a lower
price than tri-radial sailsthat's the goal, to make less
expensive sails! The reason this is possible is that we are
buying raw product by the pound rather than buying finished
sailcloth by the yardraw materials are amazingly inexpensive. |
| |
 |
| |
FiberPath Speed |
| |
Perhaps
the best aspect of FiberPath sails is that because the
sails are crosscut (FiberPath panels are 50 inches (1.27
meters) wide), we can transfer our existing sail designs and
broadseam shaping directly to FiberPath and produce sail
shapes that are already proven to be fast. We use a special
program to specify the "fiber stringing"the
mapping out of the fiber layout of each sail. and The seams
are joined using DIMENSION-POLYANT's UltraBond system, so seam
creep is eliminated (the seams are actually the strongest part
of a FiberPath sail). |
| |
 |
| |
FiberPath Performance Life & Longevity |
| |
A
FiberPath sail will hold its performance shape 1 ½
to 2 times longer than a tri-radial sail, because in a tri-radial
sail it is the secondary loads and Mylar shrinkage that ruin
the shape. FiberPath sails stay fast longer because the
secondary loads are addressed, but the shrinkage issue is the
same as that of a tri-radial sail. Of course, in addition to
their high-tech, load-path look (you can hardly see the panels),
compared to paneled sails FiberPath sails show an increased
smoothnessa result of the vastly reduced number of panels
and sections. |
| |
 |
| |
FiberPath Wind Range |
| |
The
range of a FiberPath sail is wider than a tri-radial
sail; a FiberPath sail is also easier to use because
it needs less sheet adjustment through the wind range. Because
the secondary loads are handled by the fiber layout, a FiberPath
sail keeps its designed shape throughout the wind range. And
a FiberPath sail is lighter than a tri-radial sail built
for the same application. For example, to make a FiberPath
sail heavy enough to meet the class minimum weight for a Melges
24 jib would mean packing a redundant amount of fiber into the
sailthat's how weight-efficient FiberPath is compared
to a paneled sail! |
| |
 |
| |
FiberPath Fiber Choices |
| |
FiberPath
is available with Carbon, Technora or Kevlar fibers. Technora
is an aramid, and for longevity reasons we prefer it to Kevlar;
given the same size fiber, Technora about 10% stronger than
Kevlar, but after six months of use Technora is probably 2 ½
times better than Kevlarbecause Kevlar suffers UV degradation
and Technora doesn't.
Whether Technora or Carbon, the fiber deniers (size) in a FiberPath
sail can be varied or kept uniform, and the fibers are laid
down in groups of four. We can make multiple passes of fiber
and vary the angles in any direction. We are careful, though,
to avoid placing too much fiber in one area (such as making
a clew too thick), to avoid a delamination problem.
FiberPath Carbon
sails are quite different than the current carbon laminate
sailcloths, which use big bundles of carbon (necessary from
a production standpoint to avoid brittleness). FiberPath Carbon
sails have fiber bundles that are maybe one-tenth the size
of carbon sailcloth bundles, and there are many, many more
bundles in FiberPathwhich from an engineering
standpoint is a much better way to go.
|
| |
 |
| |
FiberPath Film & Taffeta Choices |
| |
FiberPath
sails use either clear Mylar (polyester) film or a tinted (UV)
film (recommended for Kevlar). The scrim in FiberPath
is Technora in both directions, chosen for its toughness and
superior UV properties. (The scrim's role is, if the sail is
punctured, to prevent the tear from following the primary threads
and continuing to rip.) FiberPath cruising sails, with
a taffeta for durability, are in development. |
| |
|
| |
The FiberPath Laminate |
| |
We
believe the FiberPath lamination process is superior
to vacuum-formed laminates, for several reasons. FiberPath
panels are formed under extremely high pressure between the
hot-oil-filled calendar rolls of a laminator, which is exactly
the way commercial sailcloth makers build their sailcloth laminates.
While laminates such as 3DL are formed using vacuum pressure
(1 atmosphere), FiberPath laminates are formed with the
equivalent of 10 atmospheresten times the pressure. "Vacuum
bagged" laminates must rely on a relatively high amount
of glue to hold everything togetherand in terms of stretch,
glue is dead weight. FiberPath laminates require only
a minimum amount of glue to achieve a reliably tough bond between
Mylar, fiber, and scrim, and the lamination process produces
a consistent bond throughout the panel, time after time. |
|